[New Request] "harmonisiert" oder "harmonisierter ... [Discuss]

Postby Web Proposal » Wed 20. Oct 2021, 11:00

Katalogversion: EuPhraC Stand 5.3.0 30.08.2021
Anker-StrukturID: 9314143901
Anker-Strukturcode: 01.
Anker-Text: Sicherheitsdatenblatt gemäß Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006 (REACH)
Vorschlag-Sprache: de
Vorschlag-Text: "harmonisiert" oder "harmonisierter ATE"
Original-Text:
Original-Phrase-Id:
Bemerkung: CLP-VO, Anh. VI, 1.1.2.3? Zur Ausweisung von ATE-Werten als durch Anh. VI der CLP-VO harmonisiert (in Abschnitt 11). "harmonisiert" einzeln hat den Vorteil, keine Unterscheidung bei den Expositionswegen zu benötigen.
ESCom-ESSection: 1
ESCom-XMLAtt1:
ESCom-XMLAtt2:
ESCom-XMLAtt3:
ESCom-TargetGroup: Environment
ESCom-Subheader: unassigned
Web Proposal
 
Posts: 235
Joined: Thu 14. Oct 2010, 11:04

Re: [New Request]

Postby Hillmer » Sat 23. Oct 2021, 15:07

It's not allowed to create own combined -phrases. H- and P-phrases are desigend on UN level and implemented via CLP. Therefore this proposal should be declined. However willbe shortly discussed during next WG meeting.
Hillmer
 
Posts: 241
Joined: Thu 14. Oct 2010, 10:40

Re: [New Request]

Postby Hillmer » Sat 23. Oct 2021, 15:08

Sorry, wrong comment to this proposal.
This proposal is not understood - will be discussed druing next WG meeting
Hillmer
 
Posts: 241
Joined: Thu 14. Oct 2010, 10:40

Postby Hillmer » Sat 23. Oct 2021, 15:08

This proposal is open for discussion.
Hillmer
 
Posts: 241
Joined: Thu 14. Oct 2010, 10:40

Re: [New Request]

Postby Hillmer » Tue 26. Oct 2021, 11:59

It makes no sense for SECTION 3.2 but it makes sense for SECTION 11.
Hillmer
 
Posts: 241
Joined: Thu 14. Oct 2010, 10:40


Return to Safety Data Sheet phrases

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron